Lamb, Meters. E., & Gilbride, K. For the W. Ickes (Ed.), Compatible and you will in conflict relationship (pp. 33-60). Ny: Springer-Verlag. [ Backlinks ]
Lee, L., Loewenstein, Grams., Ariely, D., Hong, J., & Young, J. (2008). If I’m not sexy, are you currently beautiful or perhaps not?: Physical-attractiveness critiques and you can dating needs as a function of an individual’s very own appeal. Mental Technology, 19, 669677. [ Website links ]
Levinger, Grams., & Rands, M. (1985)patibility in marriage and other intimate matchmaking. From inside the W. Ickes (Ed.), Suitable and you may in conflict relationship (pp. 309-331). New york: Springer-Verlag. [ Website links ]
Lewin, K., Dembo, T., Festinger, L., & Sears, P. (1944). Number of aspiration. Inside the J. McV. Seem (Ed.), Character and also the decisions issues (Vol. step one, pp. 333378). Nyc: Ronald Force. [ Links ]
Enjoying, T. J. (2006). Forecasting dating relationship destiny having insiders’ and you may outsiders’ direction: Which and what’s questioned matters. Private Matchmaking, 13, 349-362. [ Links ]
Luo, S., & Klohnen, Elizabeth. C. (2005). Assortative mating and you will relationship top quality within the newly wedded couples: A couple of built means. Diary of Personality and you can Social Therapy, 88, 304-326. [ Website links ]
Legitimizing products in the initiation from heterosexual relationships
Lutz-Zois, C. J., Bradley, A great. C., Mihalik, J. L., & Moorman-Eavers, Elizabeth. R. (2006). Observed resemblance and you can matchmaking achievement among relationship couples: An enthusiastic idiographic approach. Log out of Societal and personal Dating, 23, 865-880. [ Website links ]
Madden, Yards., & Lenhart, Good. (2006). Matchmaking. Washington, DC: Declaration for the Pew Websites & American Lifestyle Investment. Recovered , of [ Backlinks ]
MacDonald, T. K., & Ross, M. (1999). Evaluating the accuracy regarding forecasts regarding the relationships dating: How and exactly why would lovers’ forecasts range from those people produced by perceiver? Identity and you may Societal Mindset Bulletin, twenty five, 14171429. [ Backlinks ]
The brand new appeal-resemblance theory certainly one of mix-gender family members: Relationship fulfillment, imagined parallels, and you may care about-offering attitudes
ater, J., & Smith, S. (1982). Paper showed during the Basic All over the world Appointment on Private Dating, Madison, WI. [ Website links ]
Merkle, Age.R., & Richardson, Roentgen.An effective. (2000). Digital dating and you will virtual associated: Conceptualizing computers mediated personal relationships. Family relations, forty-two, 187-192. [ Backlinks ]
Montoya, R. M., Horton, Roentgen. S., & Kirchner, J. (2008). Try genuine resemblance necessary for attraction? An effective meta-study of genuine and you will thought similarity. Diary of Societal and personal Matchmaking, twenty five, 889-922. [ Links ]
Morry, M. Yards. (2005). Matchmaking fulfillment due to the fact a predictor out-of similarity analysis; A test of your own appeal-similarity hypothesis. Journal away from Public and private Dating, twenty two, 561-584. [ Links ]
Murstein, B. I. (1987). An explanation and you can extension of your SVR principle out of dyadic pairing. Diary of ily, forty-two, 929-947. [ Hyperlinks ]
Orbuch, T. L., Veroff, J. Hassan, H., & Horrocks, J. (2002). Who can divorce: An effective fourteen-season longitudinal study of black couples and you can white partners. Journal out-of Societal and personal Relationship, 19, 179-202. [ Links ]
Orenstein, S. (). The like formula Match thinks it’s got discover a formula getting ruling the web based matchmaking team: A technological approach to finding Mr. otherwise Ms. Best. Team dos.0 Magazine. Recovered on regarding [ Website links ]
Rammstedt, B., & Schupp, J. (2008). Precisely the congruent survive – Identity similarities when you look at the couples. Character and you can Private Distinctions, forty-five, 533-535. [ Backlinks ]
Regan, P. C., Levin, L., Sprecher, S., Christopher, S., & Cate, Roentgen. (2000). Partner choice: Just what characteristics would anyone desire inside their brief-term intimate and enough time-title kissbrides.com click now personal partners? Journal away from Psychology and you can Human Sexuality, a dozen, 1-21. [ Links ]
Reis, H. T. (1985). The brand new part of your own self on initiation and you can course of public communication. When you look at the W. Ickes (Ed.), Appropriate and you can in conflict matchmaking (pp. 209-231). Nyc: Sprinter-Verlag. [ Links ]